It appears that Barack Obama may not be constitutionally eligible for the
office of president.

John McCain's eligibility was established in 1964, when courts ruled
Sen.Barry Goldwater was eligible although he was born in Arizona when it was a
territory, not a state. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone when it
was a U.S.territory.

And, even as the controlled media continues to ignore the ineligibility of
Obama, it will not go away. While few doubt that the Democrats will manage
to pull off his nomination, all remain poised to view the legal performance.

The first hurdle will be having Obama produce his birth certificate, which so
far he has refused to do, and prove that he was born in Hawaii on August 4,
1961, as he has always claimed. There is speculation that his American
mother may have brought him to Honolulu shortly after his birth in Kenya ,
but no proof of that has been shown.

According to the law on the books at the time of Obama's birth, the office
of president requires that a candidate be a natural citizen if the child
was not born to two U.S.citizen parents. Since he was not, should it be
proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii , as claimed, he is ineligible
without further debate. But assuring that he was born there, he has another
problem.

According to a legal researcher who has contacted the AFP, U.S. law very
clearly states: 'If only one parent is a U.S.citizen at the time of one's
birth, that parent must have "resided" in the United States for a minimum of
10 years, "five" of which must be after the age of 16.' And therein lies
Obama's new problem.

Barack Obama's father was never a U.S.citizen.

Interestingly, there isn't much paperwork on the marriage of Obama's
parents, and this has a few researchers speculating that it never took place
at all. On page 27 of 'Obama: From Promise to Power', David Mendell
writes: 'Obama later confessed that he never searched for the government
documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama's maternal grandmother)
insisted they were legally married.' He also notes that Obama's father
apparently was not legally divorced from his first wife back in Kenya at the
time, a point of contention that ultimately led to their separation. This
also would suggest that there may never have been any legal marriage by
Obama's parents at all, but the Constitution does not ban an illegitimate
child from the White House, as long as he was born inside the U.S.

Obama's mother was born in Kansas and was only 18 when Obama was born. This
means even though she satisfied the citizen requirement for 10 years, she
was not a citizen for at least five years prior to Obama's birth. In
essence, the mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic
U.S. citizenship. At most, two years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to
the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was 18. His mother would have
needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama's
birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. Barack Obama was already three
years old at the time his mother turned 21.

Technically, Obama should have been naturalized as a citizen, but that, of
course, would disqualify him from holding the office of president. If the
allegations are accurate, America could install in January of 2009 a new
president who is not even a U.S. citizen, neither born nor naturalized.

It should be demanded that Obama produce his 1961 Hawaiian birth
certificate.

If he cannot satisfactorily do so, he should be deemed immediately
ineligible to hold the office of president.'

Please pass this on to everyone you know.

For our Freedom and Liberties,



DeleteReplyForwardSpamMove...
Previous | Next | Back to Messages Save Message Text | Full Headers

Bummer ivplay ,You gave me hope,
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp

DAng it ivplay, don't mess with us like that!!

That played out a while back. I'm surprised y'all hadn't heard this previously.

666 He's the antichrist also!

quote:

He's the antichrist also!

Now that...I buy.

quote:

Originally posted by RickCJ7:
666 He's the antichrist also!

I hadn’t thought about that!!!! Thanks for pointing it out!

Hold your horses on this one.

quote:

The KOS image security border pattern does not match any known specimen from any known year. It does not match the pre-2006 nor does it match the post-2006 certificate patterns. The placement of the text in all of the pre-2006 and post-2006 certificates are almost identical pixel location matches while the image’s text placement does not match any known specimen from any known year. The shape and kerning of the fonts used in the 2006 through 2008 certificates are identical while the shape and kerning of the fonts used in the image does not match any known specimen. The KOS image shows clear signs of tampering such as the mismatch in RGB and error levels, visible indications of the previous location of the erased security border, easily detectable patterns of repeating flaws around the new security border, EXIF data that says the image was last saved with Photoshop CS3 for Macintosh, and finally a technician from Hawaii who confirms it just looks wrong.

Forgery

kenny b

I was wondering if something was being done to study that document. Something didn't look right on it although the font is what seemed to look strange to me. Nothing on Snopes yet. I wonder how they will spin this report. I bet this is all part of Hills plan to get her name on the convention. This way, when Obama is deemed in-eligible, she will swipe it away from him.

You mean it is just another B-Ho lie, he isn't the real anticrist either....

Maybe he can get his old job back selling watches on Rush street in Chicago.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: YnotAZ,